Income Inequality and Political Parties

L. David Roper (roperld@vt.edu)

(Back to Politics)
(Back to Economy and Political Parties)
(Go to data table at bottom.)

There is a measure of income inequality called the Gini index or Gini ratio. "The Gini ratio (or index of income concentration) is a statistical measure of income equality ranging from 0 to 1. A measure of 1 indicates perfect inequality; i.e., one person has all the income and the rest have none. A measure of 0 indicates perfect equality; i.e. all people having equal shares of income."-from http://blue.census.gov/hhes/income/defs/alldef.html. (Also, see http://www.iadb.org/exr/IDB/stories/1998/eng/e1198i.htm.) The Gini ratios for the U.S. are available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/f04.html (See table at bottom.)

This shows the Gini ratio since 1947. Note the large rise in inequality during the Reagan-Bush administrations and the leveling off during the Clinton administration. The huge increase for the first year of the Clinton administration appears to be the continuing momentum from the Bush administration.
This shows the % change in the Gini ratio since 1947. Note that the change was positive for every year during the Reagan/Bush administration except for 1990, and the very large increase in the first year of the Clinton administration and then decreases in the following two years. The huge increase for the first year of the Clinton administration appears to be the continuing momentum from the Bush administration. Also, note that the change was negative for every year in the Kennedy/Johnson administration except for two years, one of which was zero.

The following table shows the correlation coefficients for the % change in the Gini ratio and measures of Democratic Party control. Note that Democratic control by either measure correlates with decreasing inequality; therefore, Republican control correlates with increasing inequality. If the first Clinton-administration year huge increase is credited to the Bush administration, the Democrat President correlation is -0.226 .

Correlations Coefficients % Change in Inequality
Democrat President -0.104
Democrat Control Index -0.095


(Back to the top of Income Inequality and Political Parties)
(Back to Economy and Political Parties)
(Back to Politics)

The United States does not fare very well when comparing its Gini ratio to other countries; it is 54th out of 92 countries for which data are available. (See below for a table.) All of the European countries and Canada are far ahead. Some selected countries are shown in the following graph:

Data Tables:

Inequality (Gini ratios)
A dimensionless index scaled to vary from a minimum of zero to a maximum of one; zero representing no inequality and one representing the maximum possible degree of inequality.
Historical Income Tables - Families
Origin of Householder: 1947 to 1999
(Families as of March of the following year)
Year White Black Hispanic origin Non-White Inequality for All races % Change in Inequality Democrat President Democrat Control Index Year President
1947 0.366 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.376 1 4 1947 Truman
1948 0.36 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.371 -1.33 1 4 1948 Truman
1949 0.367 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.378 1.89 1 7 1949 Truman
1950 0.369 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.379 0.26 1 7 1950 Truman
1951 0.351 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.363 -4.22 1 7 1951 Truman
1952 0.357 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.368 1.38 1 7 1952 Truman
1953 0.35 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.359 -2.45 0 0 1953 Eisenhower
1954 0.36 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.371 3.34 0 0 1954 Eisenhower
1955 0.353 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.363 -2.16 0 3 1955 Eisenhower
1956 0.346 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.358 -1.38 0 3 1956 Eisenhower
1957 0.34 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.351 -1.96 0 3 1957 Eisenhower
1958 0.341 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.354 0.85 0 3 1958 Eisenhower
1959 0.348 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.361 1.98 0 3 1959 Eisenhower
1960 0.353 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.364 0.83 0 3 1960 Eisenhower
1961 0.363 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.374 2.75 1 7 1961 Kennedy
1962 0.35 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.362 -3.21 1 7 1962 Kennedy/Johnson
1963 0.35 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.362 0.00 1 7 1963 Johnson
1964 0.351 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.361 -0.28 1 7 1964 Johnson
1965 0.346 (NA) (NA) (NA) 0.356 -1.39 1 7 1965 Johnson
1966 0.34 0.375 (NA) (NA) 0.349 -1.97 1 7 1966 Johnson
1967 0.349 0.4 (NA) (NA) 0.358 2.58 1 7 1967 Johnson
1968 0.34 0.38 (NA) (NA) 0.348 -2.79 1 7 1968 Johnson
1969 0.341 0.378 (NA) (NA) 0.349 0.29 0 3 1969 Nixon
1970 0.345 0.388 (NA) (NA) 0.353 1.15 0 3 1970 Nixon
1971 0.347 0.385 (NA) (NA) 0.355 0.57 0 3 1971 Nixon
1972 0.35 0.398 0.355 (NA) 0.359 1.13 0 3 1972 Nixon
1973 0.346 0.394 0.349 (NA) 0.356 -0.84 0 3 1973 Nixon
1974 0.346 0.388 0.357 (NA) 0.355 -0.28 0 3 1974 Nixon
1975 0.349 0.386 0.371 (NA) 0.357 0.56 0 3 1975 Nixon
1976 0.348 0.394 0.368 (NA) 0.358 0.28 0 3 1976 Nixon
1977 0.352 0.404 0.364 (NA) 0.363 1.40 1 7 1977 Carter
1978 0.353 0.406 0.368 (NA) 0.363 0.00 1 7 1978 Carter
1979 0.354 0.41 0.381 (NA) 0.365 0.55 1 7 1979 Carter
1980 0.353 0.41 0.386 (NA) 0.365 0.00 1 7 1980 Carter
1981 0.358 0.414 0.383 (NA) 0.369 1.10 0 2 1981 Reagan
1982 0.368 0.422 0.401 (NA) 0.38 2.98 0 2 1982 Reagan
1983 0.37 0.428 0.398 (NA) 0.382 0.53 0 2 1983 Reagan
1984 0.371 0.434 0.405 (NA) 0.383 0.26 0 2 1984 Reagan
1985 0.378 0.43 0.406 (NA) 0.389 1.57 0 2 1985 Reagan
1986 0.38 0.442 0.411 (NA) 0.392 0.77 0 2 1986 Reagan
1987 0.38 0.447 0.429 (NA) 0.393 0.26 0 3 1987 Reagan
1988 0.382 0.45 0.424 (NA) 0.395 0.51 0 3 1988 Reagan
1989 0.389 0.442 0.415 (NA) 0.401 1.52 0 3 1989 Bush
1990 0.384 0.445 0.416 (NA) 0.396 -1.25 0 3 1990 Bush
1991 0.384 0.448 0.422 (NA) 0.397 0.25 0 3 1991 Bush
1992 0.39 0.462 0.423 (NA) 0.404 1.76 0 3 1992 Bush
1993 0.416 0.482 0.439 (NA) 0.429 6.19 1 7 1993 Clinton
1994 0.416 0.458 0.444 (NA) 0.426 -0.70 1 7 1994 Clinton
1995 0.409 0.457 0.439 (NA) 0.421 -1.17 1 4 1995 Clinton
1996 0.414 0.455 0.449 (NA) 0.425 0.95 1 4 1996 Clinton
1997 0.422 0.439 0.452 (NA) 0.429 0.94 1 4 1997 Clinton
1998 0.422 0.445 0.448 (NA) 0.43 0.23 1 4 1998 Clinton
1999 0.419 0.458 0.432 0.41 0.428 -0.47 1 4 1999 Clinton

U. S. average Hourly Earnings in Private Industry (1982 $) for 1964-2000 are available at http://stats.bls.gov/top20.html#OCWC .


(Back to the top of Income Inequality and Political Parties)
(Back to Economy and Political Parties)
(Back to Politics)

Comparison of Different Countries (1998 World Development Report):
http://www.worldbank.org/data/pdfs/tab2_8.pdf
Country Gini Ratio Rank
Slovak Republic 0.195 1
Belarus 0.216 2
Austria 0.231 3
Denmark 0.247 4
Belgium 0.25 5
Sweden 0.25 6
Norway 0.252 7
Romania 0.255 8
Finland 0.256 9
Ukraine 0.257 10
Czech Republic 0.266 11
Luxembourg 0.269 12
Latvia 0.27 13
Poland 0.272 14
Hungary 0.279 15
Germany 0.281 16
Bangladesh 0.283 17
Rwanda 0.289 18
Slovenia 0.292 19
India 0.297 20
Sri Lanka 0.301 21
Lao PDR 0.304 22
Bulgaria 0.308 23
Russian Federation 0.31 24
Italy 0.312 25
Pakistan 0.312 26
Canada 0.315 27
Netherlands 0.315 28
Egypt, Arab Republic 0.32 29
Spain 0.325 30
United Kingdom 0.326 31
France 0.327 32
Kazakhstan 0.327 33
Mongolia 0.332 34
Lithuania 0.336 35
Australia 0.337 36
Ghana 0.339 37
Indonesia 0.342 38
Moldavia 0.344 39
Algeria 0.353 40
Kyrgyz Republic 0.353 41
Israel 0.355 42
Vietnam 0.357 43
Turkmenistan 0.358 44
Ireland 0.359 45
Niger 0.361 46
Switzerland 0.361 47
Nepal 0.367 48
Ivory Coast 0.369 49
Tanzania 0.381 50
Morocco 0.392 51
Estonia 0.395 52
Yemen Republic 0.395 53
United States 0.401 54
Guyana 0.402 55
Tunisia 0.402 56
Uganda 0.408 57
Jamaica 0.411 58
China 0.415 59
Bolivia 0.42 60
Mauritania 0.424 61
Philippines 0.429 62
Jordan 0.434 63
Madagascar 0.434 64
Peru 0.449 65
Nigeria 0.45 66
Thailand 0.462 67
Zambia 0.462 68
Ecuador 0.466 69
Guinea 0.468 70
Venezuela 0.468 71
Costa Rica 0.47 72
Malaysia 0.484 73
El Salvador 0.499 74
Mexico 0.503 75
Nicaragua 0.503 76
Dominican Republic 0.505 77
Papua New Guinea 0.509 78
Honduras 0.537 79
Senegal 0.541 80
Lesotho 0.56 81
Guinea-Bissau 0.562 82
Chile 0.565 83
Panama 0.568 84
Zimbabwe 0.568 85
Colombia 0.572 86
Kenya 0.575 87
South Africa 0.584 88
Paraguay 0.591 89
Guatamala 0.596 90
Brazil 0.601 91
Sierra Leone 0.629 92

(Back to top of data table)
(Back to the top of Income Inequality and Political Parties)
(Back to Economy and Political Parties)
(Back to Politics)